Rape Lynchburg Virginia Lawyer Sodomy Evidence Intention Force
Rape Lynchburg Virginia Lawyer Sodomy Evidence Intention Force
Dennis v. Commonwealth
Facts:
A jury in the Circuit Court of Lynchburg City (Virginia) convicted defendant of sodomy and rape and sentenced him to a total of 20 years. The court of appeals reversed. The Commonwealth filed a petition for a rehearing en banc which was granted.
Issue:
- Whether the trial court erred in admitting evidence of similar crimes to show defendant’s intent to rape the victim?
Discussions:
Defendant contended that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of similar crimes to show his intent to rape the victim because his intent was not an element of the crime charged. The appellate court held that the evidence of prior crimes was inadmissible because intent was not an element of the offense charged; rape required a showing that the defendant engaged in sexual intercourse with the victim against her will, by force, threat, or intimidation. The Commonwealth argued that even if the trial court erred, such error was harmless. The appellate court disagreed, noting that the testimony of two women with whom defendant had acted in a similar manner was highly prejudicial and encouraged the inference that because defendant committed similar crimes in the past, he likely committed the crimes charged.
The SRIS Law Group Virginia lawyers will do their best to help you with your sex crime case. Contact a Virginia lawyer from our firm to discuss your sex crime case.
A Virginia lawyer from our firm will talk with you about your sex crime case in Virginia and advise you about your options. You can count on a lawyer from our firm to try their best to help you obtain the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax County, Loudoun County, Prince William, Richmond, Virginia Beach, Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.
Disclaimer:
These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
18.2-374.1 Code Virginia Production Child Pornography Fairfax Prince William Richmond Beach Loudoun
A person charged with a crime such as production, publication, sale, financing, etc. of child pornography pursuant to 18.2-374.1 must take the charge very seriously.
The penalties for a conviction of Virginia Code 18.2-374.1 are very serious.
The SRIS Law Group Virginia lawyers have defended cases of this nature and have the experience to defend you. Do not assume that just any Virginia lawyer has the experience necessary to defend you against a crime of this nature.
When you speak with a Virginia lawyer from our firm, he will discuss the facts of your case and then advise you about your options. An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you obtain the best possible result based on the facts of your case.
The SRIS Law Group has client meeting locations in Fairfax, Richmond, Virginia Beach, Loudoun, Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.
Virginia Code 18.2-374.1. Production, publication, sale, financing, etc., of child pornography; presumption as to age; severability.
A. For purposes of this article and Article 4 (§ 18.2-362 et seq.) of this chapter, “child pornography” means sexually explicit visual material which utilizes or has as a subject an identifiable minor. An identifiable minor is a person who was a minor at the time the visual depiction was created, adapted, or modified; or whose image as a minor was used in creating, adapting or modifying the visual depiction; and who is recognizable as an actual person by the person’s face, likeness, or other distinguishing characteristic, such as a unique birthmark or other recognizable feature; and shall not be construed to require proof of the actual identity of the identifiable minor.
For the purposes of this article and Article 4 (§ 18.2-362 et seq.) of this chapter, the term “sexually explicit visual material” means a picture, photograph, drawing, sculpture, motion picture film, digital image, including such material stored in a computer’s temporary Internet cache when three or more images or streaming videos are present, or similar visual representation which depicts sexual bestiality, a lewd exhibition of nudity, as nudity is defined in § 18.2-390, or sexual excitement, sexual conduct or sadomasochistic abuse, as also defined in § 18.2-390, or a book, magazine or pamphlet which contains such a visual representation. An undeveloped photograph or similar visual material may be sexually explicit material notwithstanding that processing or other acts may be required to make its sexually explicit content apparent.
B. A person shall be guilty of production of child pornography who:
1. Accosts, entices or solicits a person less than 18 years of age with intent to induce or force such person to perform in or be a subject of child pornography; or
2. Produces or makes or attempts or prepares to produce or make child pornography; or
3. Who knowingly takes part in or participates in the filming, photographing, or other production of child pornography by any means; or
4. Knowingly finances or attempts or prepares to finance child pornography.
5. [Repealed.]
B1. [Repealed.]
C1. Any person who violates this section, when the subject of the child pornography is a child less than 15 years of age, shall be punished by not less than five years nor more than 30 years in a state correctional facility. However, if the person is at least seven years older than the subject of the child pornography the person shall be punished by a term of imprisonment of not less than five years nor more than 30 years in a state correctional facility, five years of which shall be a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment. Any person who commits a second or subsequent violation of this section where the person is at least seven years older than the subject shall be punished by a term of imprisonment of not less than 15 years nor more than 40 years, 15 years of which shall be a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment.
C2. Any person who violates this section, when the subject of the child pornography is a person at least 15 but less than 18 years of age, shall be punished by not less than one year nor more than 20 years in a state correctional facility. However, if the person is at least seven years older than the subject of the child pornography the person shall be punished by term of imprisonment of not less than three years nor more than 30 years in a state correctional facility, three years of which shall be a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment. Any person who commits a second or subsequent violation of this section when he is at least seven years older than the subject shall be punished by a term of imprisonment of not less than 10 years nor more than 30 years, 10 years of which shall be a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment.
D. For the purposes of this section it may be inferred by text, title or appearance that a person who is depicted as or presents the appearance of being less than 18 years of age in sexually explicit visual material is less than 18 years of age.
E. Venue for a prosecution under this section may lie in the jurisdiction where the unlawful act occurs or where any sexually explicit visual material associated with a violation of this section is produced, reproduced, found, stored, or possessed.
F. The provisions of this section shall be severable and, if any of its provisions shall be held unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, then the decision of such court shall not affect or impair any of the remaining provisions.
The SRIS Law Group Virginia lawyers will do their best to help you with your sex crime case. Contact a Virginia lawyer from our firm to discuss your sex crime case. A Virginia lawyer from our firm will talk with you about your sex crime case in Virginia and advise you about your options. You can count on a lawyer from our firm to try their best to help you obtain the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Article written by A Sris
18.2-386.1 Code Virginia Unlawful Filming Penalty Fairfax Prince William Richmond Beach Loudoun
A person charged with a crime such as unlawful filming, videotaping or photographing of another pursuant to 18.2-386.1 must take the charge very seriously.
The penalties for a conviction of Virginia Code 18.2-386.1 are very serious.
The SRIS Law Group Virginia lawyers have defended cases of this nature and have the experience to defend you. Do not assume that just any Virginia lawyer has the experience necessary to defend you against a crime of this nature.
When you speak with a Virginia lawyer from our firm, he will discuss the facts of your case and then advise you about your options. An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you obtain the best possible result based on the facts of your case.
The SRIS Law Group has client meeting locations in Fairfax, Richmond, Virginia Beach, Loudoun, Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.
Virginia Code 18.2-386.1. Unlawful filming, videotaping or photographing of another; penalty.
A. It shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly and intentionally videotape, photograph, or film any nonconsenting person or create any videographic or still image record by any means whatsoever of the nonconsenting person if (i) that person is totally nude, clad in undergarments, or in a state of undress so as to expose the genitals, pubic area, buttocks or female breast in a restroom, dressing room, locker room, hotel room, motel room, tanning bed, tanning booth, bedroom or other location; or (ii) the videotape, photograph, film or videographic or still image record is created by placing the lens or image-gathering component of the recording device in a position directly beneath or between a person’s legs for the purpose of capturing an image of the person’s intimate parts or undergarments covering those intimate parts when the intimate parts or undergarments would not otherwise be visible to the general public; and when the circumstances set forth in clause (i) or (ii) are otherwise such that the person being videotaped, photographed, filmed or otherwise recorded would have a reasonable expectation of privacy.
B. The provisions of this section shall not apply to filming, videotaping or photographing or other still image or videographic recording by (i) law-enforcement officers pursuant to a criminal investigation which is otherwise lawful or (ii) correctional officials and local or regional jail officials for security purposes or for investigations of alleged misconduct involving a person committed to the Department of Corrections or to a local or regional jail, or to any sound recording of an oral conversation made as a result of any videotaping or filming pursuant to Chapter 6 (§ 19.2-61 et seq.) of Title 19.2.
C. A violation of subsection A shall be punishable as a Class 1 misdemeanor.
D. A violation of subsection A involving a nonconsenting person under the age of 18 shall be punishable as a Class 6 felony.
E. Where it is alleged in the warrant, information, or indictment on which the person is convicted and found by the court or jury trying the case that the person has previously been convicted within the 10-year period immediately preceding the offense charged of two or more of the offenses specified in this section, each such offense occurring on a different date, and when such offenses were not part of a common act, transaction, or scheme, and such person has been at liberty as defined in § 53.1-151 between each conviction, he shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony.
The SRIS Law Group Virginia lawyers will do their best to help you with your sex crime case. Contact a Virginia lawyer from our firm to discuss your sex crime case. A Virginia lawyer from our firm will talk with you about your sex crime case in Virginia and advise you about your options. You can count on a lawyer from our firm to try their best to help you obtain the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Article written by A Sris
18.2-67.4 Code Virginia Sexual Battery Penalty Fairfax Prince William Richmond Beach Loudoun
A person charged with a sex crime such as forcible sodomy pursuant to 18.2-67.4 must take the charge very seriously.
The penalties for a conviction of Virginia Code 18.2-67.4 are very serious. The worst part is that it will place you on the sex offender registry for life.
The SRIS Law Group Virginia lawyers have defended cases of this nature and have the experience to defend you. Do not assume that just any Virginia lawyer has the experience necessary to defend you against a sex crime.
When you speak with a Virginia lawyer from our firm, he will discuss the facts of your case and then advise you about your options. An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you obtain the best possible result based on the facts of your case.
The SRIS Law Group has client meeting locations in Fairfax, Richmond, Virginia Beach, Loudoun, Fredericksburg & Lynchburg.
Virginia Code 18.2-67.4. Sexual battery.
A. An accused is guilty of sexual battery if he sexually abuses, as defined in § 18.2-67.10, (i) the complaining witness against the will of the complaining witness, by force, threat, intimidation, or ruse, (ii) an inmate who has been committed to jail or convicted and sentenced to confinement in a state or local correctional facility or regional jail, and the accused is an employee or contractual employee of, or a volunteer with, the state or local correctional facility or regional jail; is in a position of authority over the inmate; and knows that the inmate is under the jurisdiction of the state or local correctional facility or regional jail, or (iii) a probationer, parolee, or a pretrial defendant or posttrial offender under the jurisdiction of the Department of Corrections, a local community-based probation services agency, a pretrial services agency, a local or regional jail for the purposes of imprisonment, a work program or any other parole/probationary or pretrial services or agency and the accused is an employee or contractual employee of, or a volunteer with, the Department of Corrections, a local community-based probation services agency, a pretrial services agency or a local or regional jail; is in a position of authority over an offender; and knows that the offender is under the jurisdiction of the Department of Corrections, a local community-based probation services agency, a pretrial services agency or a local or regional jail.
B. Sexual battery is a Class 1 misdemeanor.
The SRIS Law Group Virginia lawyers will do their best to help you with your sex crime case. Contact a Virginia lawyer from our firm to discuss your sex crime case. A Virginia lawyer from our firm will talk with you about your sex crime case in Virginia and advise you about your options. You can count on a lawyer from our firm to try their best to help you obtain the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Article written by A Sris
Virginia Evidence Absence Rape Attorney Fairfax County
Defendant could not be convicted as accessory to rape in the absence of evidence that principal committed rape. Innocent agent rule was antithetical to construction that rape required penetration of female sexual organ by perpetrator’s sexual organ.
Prosecution of Child Pornography is on the rise in Virginia
Frequently, innocent possession or receipts of images are being prosecuted by federal prosecutors & state prosecutors in Virginia.
If you have been charged with Child Pornography in Virginia, contact the SRIS Law Group Virginia Child Pornography defense attorneys.
Our Virginia Child Pornography defense lawyers defend cases in both the federal courts of Virginia & the state courts of Virginia.
The VA Child Pornography defense lawyers have the experience and knowledge necessary to defend you against these types of charges.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax, Richmond, Lynchburg, Fredericksburg, Virginia Beach & Manassas.
Virginia Rape Forcible Sodomy Convicted Lawyers Richmond City
Defendant was properly convicted of attempted rape and forcible sodomy because sexual battery was not a lesser-included offense of both crimes and defendant was not entitled to a jury instruction on sexual battery as a lesser-included offense.
Prosecution of Child Pornography is on the rise in Virginia
Frequently, innocent possession or receipts of images are being prosecuted by federal prosecutors & state prosecutors in Virginia.
If you have been charged with Child Pornography in Virginia, contact the SRIS Law Group Virginia Child Pornography defense attorneys.
Our Virginia Child Pornography defense lawyers defend cases in both the federal courts of Virginia & the state courts of Virginia.
The VA Child Pornography defense lawyers have the experience and knowledge necessary to defend you against these types of charges.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax, Richmond, Lynchburg, Fredericksburg, Virginia Beach & Manassas.
Virginia Assault Rape Conviction Attorney Stafford County
Conviction of defendants for assault with intent to commit rape upon young girl was proper because if fact regarding particulars of time, place, and circumstances of conversation could have been shown, a witness would have been introduced.
Prosecution of Child Pornography is on the rise in Virginia
Frequently, innocent possession or receipts of images are being prosecuted by federal prosecutors & state prosecutors in Virginia.
If you have been charged with Child Pornography in Virginia, contact the SRIS Law Group Virginia Child Pornography defense attorneys.
Our Virginia Child Pornography defense lawyers defend cases in both the federal courts of Virginia & the state courts of Virginia.
The VA Child Pornography defense lawyers have the experience and knowledge necessary to defend you against these types of charges.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax, Richmond, Lynchburg, Fredericksburg, Virginia Beach & Manassas
Virginia Sex Offender Treatment Probation Violation Lawyers Richmond County
A trial court did not err in finding that defendant violated his probation by refusing to admit that he committed the charged crime during court-ordered sex offender treatment because defendant’s Alford plea did not contain an implicit promise that he would never be required to admit his guilt.
Prosecution of Child Pornography is on the rise in Virginia
Frequently, innocent possession or receipts of images are being prosecuted by federal prosecutors & state prosecutors in Virginia.
If you have been charged with Child Pornography in Virginia, contact the SRIS Law Group Virginia Child Pornography defense attorneys.
Our Virginia Child Pornography defense lawyers defend cases in both the federal courts of Virginia & the state courts of Virginia.
The VA Child Pornography defense lawyers have the experience and knowledge necessary to defend you against these types of charges.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax, Richmond, Lynchburg, Fredericksburg, Virginia Beach & Manassas.
Virginia Sex Violation Conviction Attorney Loudoun County
Defendant was required to register as a sex offender pursuant to Va. Code Ann. § 9.1-902(B)(1) after he was convicted of nine violations of Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-386.1 because he had accumulated at least three convictions of § 18.2-386.1 and the contemporaneousness of his convictions was not a bar to enforcement of the registration requirement.
Prosecution of Child Pornography is on the rise in Virginia
Frequently, innocent possession or receipts of images are being prosecuted by federal prosecutors & state prosecutors in Virginia.
If you have been charged with Child Pornography in Virginia, contact the SRIS Law Group Virginia Child Pornography defense attorneys.
Our Virginia Child Pornography defense lawyers defend cases in both the federal courts of Virginia & the state courts of Virginia.
The VA Child Pornography defense lawyers have the experience and knowledge necessary to defend you against these types of charges.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax, Richmond, Lynchburg, Fredericksburg, Virginia Beach & Manassas.
Virginia Sex Offender Registration Minor Solicitation Lawyers Fairfax County
Trial court did not err in requiring defendant to register as sex offender pursuant to Va. Code Ann. § 9.1-902(A)(2) based on defendant’s conviction of computer solicitation for sex with minor based on defendant’s actions in using his computer to solicit sex from someone he thought was 13-year-old girl, but who was, in fact, a police officer.
Prosecution of Child Pornography is on the rise in Virginia
Frequently, innocent possession or receipt of images are being prosecuted by federal prosecutors & state prosecutors in Virginia.
If you have been charged with Child Pornography in Virginia, contact the SRIS Law Group Virginia Child Pornography defense attorneys.
Our Virginia Child Pornography defense lawyers defend cases in both the federal courts of Virginia & the state courts of Virginia.
The VA Child Pornography defense lawyers have the experience and knowledge necessary to defend you against these types of charges.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax, Richmond, Lynchburg, Fredericksburg, Virginia Beach & Manassas.













